April 16, 2025

Banking’s Next Act: Regulatory Shifts Ahead

Banking’s Next Act: Regulatory Shifts Ahead
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player icon

As regulatory and political landscapes shift, financial institutions must stay agile and innovative to navigate new challenges and opportunities. In this episode, host Lynn Sautter Beal is joined by David Pommerehn, General Counsel and Head of Regulatory Affairs at CBA, and Billy Rielly, Head of Public Affairs at CBA, to unpack how political shifts, state-level regulations and consumer protection mandates are reshaping the lending landscape. They also dive into the growing influence of AI and the potential for new legal frameworks around crypto and stablecoins.

Join us as we discuss:

  • The challenges of navigating regulatory uncertainty with a new administration
  • The growing influence of state-level regulations and consumer protection laws
  • The impact of late fees and overdraft fees on institutions and consumers
  • How AI is reshaping compliance and risk management
WEBVTT

1
00:00:04.519 --> 00:00:08.000
Hi everyone, and welcome to Leaders in Lending. This is

2
00:00:08.039 --> 00:00:10.919
Lynd Soderbiel. I'm happy to be joining you here today

3
00:00:10.960 --> 00:00:14.880
from CBA Live, and I have Dave Palmeran and Billy

4
00:00:14.960 --> 00:00:18.239
Riley joining me today, so thanks thanks for being here, gentlemen.

5
00:00:18.600 --> 00:00:20.239
I would appreciate it if both of you could just

6
00:00:20.280 --> 00:00:22.960
kind of introduce yourselves and what you do at CBA.

7
00:00:23.160 --> 00:00:26.559
Sure. Yeah, Hi everyone. David Palmer, I am a general

8
00:00:26.600 --> 00:00:30.160
counsel and head of Regulatory Affairs at CBA, so I

9
00:00:30.199 --> 00:00:33.479
deal a lot with the regulators in DC and of

10
00:00:33.479 --> 00:00:36.920
course with all the ongoing litigation around some of the

11
00:00:37.079 --> 00:00:38.759
former CFPB's rule bankings.

12
00:00:39.119 --> 00:00:41.799
And I'm Billy Riley, head of Public Affairs, so we

13
00:00:41.960 --> 00:00:45.479
handle messaging for the organization on behalf of our membership,

14
00:00:45.759 --> 00:00:49.119
work very closely with the regulatory and legislative teams in

15
00:00:49.200 --> 00:00:52.880
terms of policy communications, and also support broader corporate comms

16
00:00:52.880 --> 00:00:56.439
and executive comms, including helping to set up this conference

17
00:00:56.479 --> 00:00:58.920
and some of our other events like our Executive Banking School.

18
00:00:59.479 --> 00:01:02.039
Well great, thank you again, appreciate you taking the time

19
00:01:02.079 --> 00:01:05.319
to join us today. So i'd really just ask each

20
00:01:05.319 --> 00:01:08.359
of you to kind of give a brief overview obviously

21
00:01:08.359 --> 00:01:11.959
there's a lot of things changing in the market right

22
00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:14.879
now with the current regulatory and political environment, but just

23
00:01:14.959 --> 00:01:16.439
kind of a lay of the land, like where do

24
00:01:16.439 --> 00:01:19.200
you see things stand right now with the current environment

25
00:01:19.239 --> 00:01:21.760
out there, and how it's really impacting CBA members.

26
00:01:21.959 --> 00:01:24.840
Sure, yeah, I mean it's a very unique environment and

27
00:01:24.879 --> 00:01:28.920
it's changing by the minute. So any predictions we could

28
00:01:28.959 --> 00:01:30.680
give you probably are going to be wrong because they're

29
00:01:30.719 --> 00:01:34.159
going to change very rapidly right now. I mean, we're

30
00:01:34.159 --> 00:01:37.400
in this kind of limbo right where the new administram

31
00:01:37.560 --> 00:01:42.239
administration has come in a lot of executive orders, a

32
00:01:42.239 --> 00:01:46.719
lot of internal kind of rearranging of some of the agencies,

33
00:01:47.799 --> 00:01:49.439
and we're not quite sure where it's going to end

34
00:01:49.519 --> 00:01:52.599
up at this point. So we're working very diligently with

35
00:01:52.640 --> 00:01:57.680
the administration. We have new we have nominations for new director,

36
00:01:57.719 --> 00:02:00.319
we have nominations for a new comptroll or that are

37
00:02:00.319 --> 00:02:03.000
working their way through the Senate now, and so hopefully

38
00:02:03.000 --> 00:02:05.920
well once we get people in place in a permanent basis,

39
00:02:06.519 --> 00:02:10.400
there will be some think stability though that we can

40
00:02:10.439 --> 00:02:13.599
go and start talking to the individual agencies. We need

41
00:02:13.680 --> 00:02:18.080
the agencies to function, We need to know who we're

42
00:02:18.080 --> 00:02:22.000
dealing with right and the banks need to have certainty

43
00:02:22.000 --> 00:02:24.360
within the markets and the rules that they have to

44
00:02:24.400 --> 00:02:28.159
abide buying compliance issues. So there's a lot of question

45
00:02:28.199 --> 00:02:30.120
marks right now. There's a lot on people's minds, and

46
00:02:30.199 --> 00:02:32.840
so we're working through that and hopefully we'll again get

47
00:02:32.840 --> 00:02:34.599
to a better place in the near future.

48
00:02:35.120 --> 00:02:37.599
Yeah, I just add on that. I think the uncertainty

49
00:02:37.639 --> 00:02:41.280
is a big one, but it poses some we think positives,

50
00:02:41.280 --> 00:02:44.919
but also some potential headwinds. So obviously bankers know that

51
00:02:45.080 --> 00:02:47.719
the last four years in the prior administration in terms

52
00:02:47.719 --> 00:02:51.159
of some of the financial regulatory rules that came out,

53
00:02:51.919 --> 00:02:55.439
pos significant challenges for our members and kept us at

54
00:02:55.479 --> 00:02:59.400
CBA very busy. Obviously a lot of that is going away,

55
00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:02.840
or we think it is, and so in the sense

56
00:03:03.000 --> 00:03:05.000
and the positive sense, that may be a good thing.

57
00:03:05.039 --> 00:03:09.319
But we also have a political system right now with

58
00:03:09.479 --> 00:03:13.439
Republicans that may be a little bit more skeptical of

59
00:03:13.560 --> 00:03:17.840
large institutions, including large banks in particular with the rise

60
00:03:17.840 --> 00:03:21.120
of populism. So something else to keep an eye on,

61
00:03:21.240 --> 00:03:24.439
especially as it relates to Capitol Hill. But some of

62
00:03:24.439 --> 00:03:27.120
the proposals out there that maybe our banks won't be

63
00:03:27.120 --> 00:03:27.879
a supportive of.

64
00:03:28.360 --> 00:03:31.000
Sure, and I definitely hear you on the uncertainty. You know,

65
00:03:31.439 --> 00:03:34.919
we deal with We have over one hundred lenders of

66
00:03:35.000 --> 00:03:37.759
both banks and credit unions on our platform, and my

67
00:03:37.879 --> 00:03:40.800
team is actually supporting them through their regulatory exams and

68
00:03:40.879 --> 00:03:44.560
so that is a that and we deal with all

69
00:03:44.599 --> 00:03:48.479
of the regulators too, So certainty certainly helps us do

70
00:03:48.520 --> 00:03:51.400
a better job for our clients and helps our clients

71
00:03:51.400 --> 00:03:55.400
have a better understanding of what to expect. So, you know,

72
00:03:55.639 --> 00:03:58.680
with kind of the status of the CFPB right now,

73
00:03:59.560 --> 00:04:05.000
ongoing legislative debates, and and certainly states getting more active

74
00:04:05.000 --> 00:04:08.199
in the regulatory space, and potentially even more so if

75
00:04:08.360 --> 00:04:13.560
if the federal credential regulators kind of back off. You know,

76
00:04:13.599 --> 00:04:16.240
I think, how do you you know, how are banks

77
00:04:16.319 --> 00:04:20.120
adapting to these uncertainties and and what kind of advice

78
00:04:20.160 --> 00:04:23.560
are you giving your members on ways to stay kind

79
00:04:23.600 --> 00:04:26.959
of proactive and to at least navigate as smoothly as

80
00:04:26.959 --> 00:04:28.399
they can through this uncertainty.

81
00:04:28.879 --> 00:04:31.040
Yeah, I mean it's as Billy alluded to. I mean,

82
00:04:31.040 --> 00:04:33.120
a lot of the rules that they're currently gearing up

83
00:04:33.160 --> 00:04:36.160
for are you know, in limbo right now that could

84
00:04:36.160 --> 00:04:39.439
go away either through actions by Congress, actions by the

85
00:04:39.480 --> 00:04:44.040
agencies themselves or through litigation. Our banks are business as

86
00:04:44.120 --> 00:04:47.720
usual right now. I mean they're they're still beholden to

87
00:04:47.879 --> 00:04:52.399
the consumer protection laws and you know, and they're you know,

88
00:04:52.879 --> 00:04:55.720
complying with all of these things and regardless of whether

89
00:04:55.800 --> 00:04:58.560
or not the c FPB is and they're supervising them

90
00:04:58.600 --> 00:05:01.079
for any of these issues. Hopefully we'll get back to

91
00:05:01.319 --> 00:05:04.600
again a sense of stability on the supervisory side soon.

92
00:05:05.879 --> 00:05:11.560
The prudential banking regulators are supervisoring, supervising, holding, you know,

93
00:05:11.959 --> 00:05:16.480
examinations of those things, but a lot of the prep

94
00:05:16.560 --> 00:05:19.720
for things like ten seventy one small business data collection,

95
00:05:21.079 --> 00:05:24.120
this this is a huge poll for the industry, and

96
00:05:24.160 --> 00:05:28.680
they need to understand where that's going and what the

97
00:05:28.680 --> 00:05:30.519
bureau might do with it, what's going to be the

98
00:05:30.519 --> 00:05:34.839
outcome of the litigation, and so in large part, I think,

99
00:05:35.240 --> 00:05:37.759
you know, you have to plan for what we know now,

100
00:05:38.639 --> 00:05:40.879
and that's where they're going with this right now. But

101
00:05:40.920 --> 00:05:44.199
things could change on a dime and that cost compliance

102
00:05:44.240 --> 00:05:47.639
dollars obviously, which is not you know, ideal. But I mean,

103
00:05:47.680 --> 00:05:50.199
banks need to get back to what we're talking about,

104
00:05:50.240 --> 00:05:52.759
the certainty around some of the rule making, some of

105
00:05:52.519 --> 00:05:55.800
the compliance issues that they have right now in order

106
00:05:55.839 --> 00:05:59.680
to better function and quite honestly better serve the US public.

107
00:05:59.759 --> 00:06:02.680
Then sure, and I think you know we we certainly

108
00:06:02.800 --> 00:06:05.639
the clients that we work with are are many of

109
00:06:05.680 --> 00:06:08.079
them are not CB members. There are more, you know,

110
00:06:08.160 --> 00:06:12.120
regional community banks, and and the potential costs of uncertainty

111
00:06:12.519 --> 00:06:15.040
I think is hitting everyone hard, but certainly hitting them

112
00:06:15.160 --> 00:06:18.360
them hard as well. So I think one thing that

113
00:06:18.360 --> 00:06:20.480
that does stay in the spotlight, as you mentioned consumer

114
00:06:20.519 --> 00:06:23.560
protection and and how the you know, the banks are

115
00:06:23.560 --> 00:06:25.399
doing the things that they need to do to protect

116
00:06:25.439 --> 00:06:29.600
the consumer regardless of the rules, and the regulators are

117
00:06:29.600 --> 00:06:33.759
still doing their their regular exams, but late fees, overdraft

118
00:06:33.800 --> 00:06:37.199
fees certainly remain in the spotlight as well as SERIA

119
00:06:37.319 --> 00:06:41.319
modernization efforts and UH and lately some some UH I think,

120
00:06:41.480 --> 00:06:45.040
proposals to to get rid of CDFI as an organization.

121
00:06:46.279 --> 00:06:48.879
But you know, kind of with all of the different

122
00:06:48.879 --> 00:06:50.879
things happening, you know, what are some of the areas

123
00:06:50.920 --> 00:06:54.079
you think that that banks and financial institutions should really

124
00:06:54.120 --> 00:06:58.000
be paying special attentions to as it relates to some

125
00:06:58.079 --> 00:07:01.839
of those I think, particularly the consumer focus items like

126
00:07:01.959 --> 00:07:04.199
late FEZ rate caps, overdraft.

127
00:07:04.959 --> 00:07:08.680
I mean, these are all important issues. Clearly, this was

128
00:07:08.759 --> 00:07:13.279
part of the previous administration's junk fee campaign quote unquote

129
00:07:13.319 --> 00:07:17.000
junk fee campaign. I think it's been painted in a large,

130
00:07:17.240 --> 00:07:21.319
large part as a populist issue, and actually the cost

131
00:07:21.399 --> 00:07:24.560
benefit analysis wasn't really completed when it's when they were

132
00:07:24.560 --> 00:07:27.879
looking about how these rules actually could impact the US consumer.

133
00:07:29.319 --> 00:07:31.120
You know, what should our banks be looking for. I mean,

134
00:07:31.399 --> 00:07:34.439
as you know, with late fees and with overdraft fees,

135
00:07:34.480 --> 00:07:39.480
there's litigation in both those fronts. The overdraft fee rule

136
00:07:39.600 --> 00:07:43.959
is subject to a Congressional Review Act resolution currently in

137
00:07:44.439 --> 00:07:49.160
front of Congress, so you know how they are navigating again,

138
00:07:49.240 --> 00:07:53.720
it's you know, hope we have answers soon. I hope

139
00:07:53.759 --> 00:07:56.040
that we get back to a place where we have

140
00:07:56.120 --> 00:08:00.360
a durable, credible agency within the cfp B that's going

141
00:08:00.399 --> 00:08:03.560
to do cost benefit analysis rule making where there is

142
00:08:03.600 --> 00:08:06.680
a market failure. Right now, we're really just kind of

143
00:08:06.680 --> 00:08:10.040
combating all these rules that were more political in nature

144
00:08:10.519 --> 00:08:14.839
than really addressing a market failure. Some of our member institutions,

145
00:08:14.839 --> 00:08:19.399
for instance, an overdraft, they're the leaders and putting together

146
00:08:19.600 --> 00:08:24.800
mitigating ways for consumers to actually avoid overdraft fees. With

147
00:08:24.879 --> 00:08:28.079
buffer amounts, twenty four hour grace periods, things of that nature.

148
00:08:29.000 --> 00:08:34.120
Where was the market failure that you know, precipitated this

149
00:08:34.120 --> 00:08:38.759
this need for this kind of outlandish rule and so

150
00:08:39.360 --> 00:08:42.080
you know, that's what we're dealing with now. I am

151
00:08:42.600 --> 00:08:45.399
very hopeful that over the next year or so, we

152
00:08:45.399 --> 00:08:48.639
can see a lot of this litigation go away, get

153
00:08:48.679 --> 00:08:52.440
back to really appropriate rule making that's done within the

154
00:08:52.440 --> 00:08:55.799
confines of authority and not for political reasons.

155
00:08:56.200 --> 00:08:59.200
And just to add to that, so obviously David mentioned

156
00:08:59.240 --> 00:09:03.360
the Lafey and overdraft fees driven largely by the prior administration,

157
00:09:03.600 --> 00:09:07.240
and you also mentioned ratecaps, And we recently saw a

158
00:09:07.320 --> 00:09:10.320
proposal introduced in the House as a companion to a

159
00:09:10.399 --> 00:09:13.960
previous legislative proposal in the Senate, both of which had

160
00:09:14.000 --> 00:09:19.120
bipartisan support, seeking to limit bank in credit card issuer's

161
00:09:19.159 --> 00:09:23.000
ability to charge interest rates above ten percent, which is

162
00:09:23.279 --> 00:09:26.159
concerning for a lot of different reasons. And so that's

163
00:09:26.159 --> 00:09:28.519
something we're keeping our eye on because of the bipartisan

164
00:09:28.600 --> 00:09:31.919
nature of it, and one of the many ways that

165
00:09:31.919 --> 00:09:34.000
we're trying to push back on that here at CBA,

166
00:09:34.759 --> 00:09:37.200
whether in the media or through some of our blogs

167
00:09:37.200 --> 00:09:39.960
and op eds, is trying to show through data and

168
00:09:40.000 --> 00:09:42.840
research the impact that that would have on consumers and

169
00:09:42.919 --> 00:09:45.440
especially consumers at the margin and their access to credit,

170
00:09:45.759 --> 00:09:49.759
because a lot of times these legislative proposals make for

171
00:09:49.960 --> 00:09:52.919
good political headlines, but they have real world implications on

172
00:09:52.960 --> 00:09:54.159
the people we're working to serve.

173
00:09:54.399 --> 00:09:57.320
Yeah. Absolutely, and I think you both called it out

174
00:09:57.360 --> 00:10:01.759
that you know, doing a true data driven cost benefit analysis,

175
00:10:01.799 --> 00:10:04.159
what really will happen if you impact if you make

176
00:10:04.240 --> 00:10:06.559
changes like that, And the answer is that a lot

177
00:10:06.600 --> 00:10:10.399
of lenders simply won't be able to lend to, especially

178
00:10:10.879 --> 00:10:14.600
UH consumers. That I think when when we originally started

179
00:10:14.600 --> 00:10:17.440
our company, we're looking to expand access to credit and

180
00:10:17.600 --> 00:10:20.120
maybe identify what we saw as those hidden primes or

181
00:10:20.159 --> 00:10:24.080
near primes that the banks weren't reaching. And those folks

182
00:10:24.159 --> 00:10:26.039
are are easy to get kind of put out on

183
00:10:26.120 --> 00:10:29.360
the edges of the banking industry. Again, So what do

184
00:10:29.399 --> 00:10:33.039
you you know as you as you think about maybe

185
00:10:33.120 --> 00:10:36.840
the federal regulators being weakened a little bit, or being

186
00:10:36.879 --> 00:10:41.480
defunded or having less staff. Potentially, do you see a

187
00:10:41.519 --> 00:10:45.279
potential for individual states to create more kind of a

188
00:10:45.279 --> 00:10:48.600
patchwork of regulation that it makes it even harder for

189
00:10:48.639 --> 00:10:48.960
the Bank.

190
00:10:50.000 --> 00:10:52.919
It's a great point. Yeah, and we need a strong

191
00:10:53.240 --> 00:10:57.639
federal regulator to set you know, the kind of the

192
00:10:57.679 --> 00:11:01.840
path here. It's it's difficult for our member institutions to

193
00:11:01.919 --> 00:11:05.919
kind of piecemeal regulation and enforcement through different state actions.

194
00:11:06.080 --> 00:11:08.759
We're seeing a little bit of that now. I would

195
00:11:08.759 --> 00:11:11.200
imagine that you'll see more ramp up with the AGS,

196
00:11:12.159 --> 00:11:17.720
especially in blue states where if we don't have you know,

197
00:11:17.759 --> 00:11:23.159
proper supervision from the Bureau or from from the Prudentials. Again,

198
00:11:23.200 --> 00:11:26.360
we're really hopeful that the Bureau will start that process

199
00:11:26.399 --> 00:11:29.639
again and that we'll get back to a good place.

200
00:11:29.759 --> 00:11:31.759
There's also the private right of action for a lot

201
00:11:31.759 --> 00:11:35.639
of the enumerated statutes within Dodd Frank. So we are

202
00:11:35.679 --> 00:11:38.559
somewhat concerned that you could see an uptaken you know,

203
00:11:38.639 --> 00:11:42.799
lawsuits from the plane offs bar. But you know, that

204
00:11:42.840 --> 00:11:44.799
wouldn't be anything new. The planet bar is going to

205
00:11:44.799 --> 00:11:46.600
take advantage when it can take advantage of something. But

206
00:11:47.960 --> 00:11:50.000
I do think that we'll we'll probably get more action

207
00:11:50.080 --> 00:11:52.360
from the states as we move, you know, into the

208
00:11:52.399 --> 00:11:54.240
near future. But again, I don't think that was anything

209
00:11:54.240 --> 00:11:58.039
particularly new. We saw that ramp up even with the

210
00:11:58.080 --> 00:12:01.039
Biden administration. Yeah, so I think that we'll see a

211
00:12:01.039 --> 00:12:01.879
little bit more of it down.

212
00:12:02.639 --> 00:12:05.200
Yeah, and that's definitely something you know, we certainly track

213
00:12:05.240 --> 00:12:08.159
a lot with like the legislation in Colorado and different

214
00:12:09.080 --> 00:12:11.519
and did MACA opt outs as are of challenging to

215
00:12:11.559 --> 00:12:15.120
manage when you're a company that works across the across

216
00:12:15.120 --> 00:12:17.960
the country. So you know, as you think though about

217
00:12:18.000 --> 00:12:23.279
protecting consumers insurance competition, do you see any tension between

218
00:12:23.399 --> 00:12:26.279
kind of those two things, like how are your banks

219
00:12:26.799 --> 00:12:32.399
on bank members staying competitive and with each other when

220
00:12:33.480 --> 00:12:36.360
there's certainly a lot of I think in a regulator

221
00:12:36.440 --> 00:12:39.159
d certainty and they also have to think about consumer protection.

222
00:12:40.279 --> 00:12:42.000
I can start with them, and I mean we always

223
00:12:42.000 --> 00:12:46.320
talk about how the banking industry in America is among

224
00:12:46.360 --> 00:12:49.759
the most highly regulated, most competitive in the world. Right,

225
00:12:49.799 --> 00:12:53.159
and so that really does benefit consumers in the sense

226
00:12:53.159 --> 00:12:56.799
that because of the regulatory apparatus, they can have confidence

227
00:12:56.840 --> 00:12:59.159
that they are being protected, that their money is safe

228
00:12:59.159 --> 00:13:02.840
and secure. But also with that many banks and credit

229
00:13:02.919 --> 00:13:05.600
unions and also with the rise of fintech and tech

230
00:13:05.600 --> 00:13:10.159
companies that are increasingly offering financial services, consumers have amazing

231
00:13:10.240 --> 00:13:13.200
ability to choose financial products and tools that meet their

232
00:13:13.279 --> 00:13:17.039
unique needs, right and so I feel pretty confident, Dave.

233
00:13:17.240 --> 00:13:20.200
I think you would agree as well that this system

234
00:13:20.440 --> 00:13:25.600
really does provide so much flexibility and choice and access,

235
00:13:26.039 --> 00:13:28.120
and I think nowhere has that been more evident over

236
00:13:28.120 --> 00:13:31.639
the last decade than in overdraft. And you've seen so

237
00:13:31.759 --> 00:13:36.159
many of our members innovate on that product, offering financial

238
00:13:36.159 --> 00:13:40.919
flexibility and next day grace periods because you know, banks

239
00:13:40.960 --> 00:13:44.360
really want to meet consumers where they're at number one,

240
00:13:44.399 --> 00:13:47.639
but number two. The market is getting more competitive with

241
00:13:47.799 --> 00:13:52.120
other FinTechs and such that are offering are offering low

242
00:13:52.279 --> 00:13:56.120
or no cost overdraft services, and so that competition, I

243
00:13:56.120 --> 00:13:59.960
think is benefiting consumers, and consumers can have that comp

244
00:14:00.000 --> 00:14:02.639
finance when they meet their needs within the well regulated

245
00:14:02.720 --> 00:14:04.519
banking system, that they're also being protected.

246
00:14:04.799 --> 00:14:07.399
Yeah, I agree with all that, and I would add

247
00:14:07.440 --> 00:14:11.879
though that, you know, with the fintech industry or banking

248
00:14:11.919 --> 00:14:14.399
as a service as a model now becoming more and

249
00:14:14.440 --> 00:14:19.600
more popular, it's it's vital that our our member institutions,

250
00:14:20.480 --> 00:14:24.399
large regionals or national banks have the ability to innovate,

251
00:14:25.000 --> 00:14:27.519
aren't confined by the rules that are being written solely

252
00:14:27.879 --> 00:14:31.440
for them, right without having an equal playing you know,

253
00:14:31.559 --> 00:14:34.919
or a level playing field, for those those fintech companies

254
00:14:34.960 --> 00:14:38.120
and for you know innovators in that space. I mean,

255
00:14:38.440 --> 00:14:41.200
we're all for the innovation on either side, but we

256
00:14:41.320 --> 00:14:43.080
have to we have to be able to have the

257
00:14:43.120 --> 00:14:45.360
flexibility to do that as well. And I'll i add

258
00:14:45.399 --> 00:14:47.519
too though, this is another reason the CPP is very

259
00:14:47.519 --> 00:14:51.919
important because they have a supervisory theory over the non

260
00:14:51.960 --> 00:14:55.960
banks and that is going to be vitally important going

261
00:14:56.000 --> 00:14:58.440
into the next few years where we're having I think

262
00:14:58.440 --> 00:15:01.440
a larger up uptick in you know, banking as a

263
00:15:01.480 --> 00:15:04.600
service and FinTechs entering that space and partnerships.

264
00:15:04.759 --> 00:15:08.000
Sure, there's a there's a great story from the early

265
00:15:08.080 --> 00:15:10.960
days of Upstart, where you know, I was founded by

266
00:15:11.080 --> 00:15:14.919
ex Google executives primarily and people who had not worked

267
00:15:14.919 --> 00:15:19.600
in banking, and in their exuberants to be part of

268
00:15:19.639 --> 00:15:23.200
the industry and to be you know, friendly to regulators

269
00:15:23.240 --> 00:15:26.000
and to get in front of them, showed up at

270
00:15:26.000 --> 00:15:28.559
the OCC Office of Information in San Francisco and said, hey,

271
00:15:28.600 --> 00:15:30.720
we want to tell you about what we're doing, very excited,

272
00:15:31.039 --> 00:15:33.919
which was maybe the first time that that had happened

273
00:15:34.000 --> 00:15:36.840
at an OCC office. And so we do work very

274
00:15:36.840 --> 00:15:39.919
closely with the regulators, like we why we don't get examined,

275
00:15:39.919 --> 00:15:42.440
our clients do, uh, And so we spend a lot

276
00:15:42.440 --> 00:15:45.279
of time with the OCC and helping them understand and

277
00:15:45.279 --> 00:15:47.919
and the FDAC and helping them understand how we use

278
00:15:47.960 --> 00:15:50.399
AI and how we think about AI and how we

279
00:15:50.440 --> 00:15:54.039
work with our bank partners. You know, I think is

280
00:15:54.080 --> 00:15:57.159
that a space that you're particularly seeing probably more uncertainty

281
00:15:57.200 --> 00:16:00.799
and maybe less of an even playing field where the

282
00:16:00.840 --> 00:16:03.679
banks may be getting challenged harder on use of AI

283
00:16:04.159 --> 00:16:07.279
versus FinTechs and banking as as service providers can can

284
00:16:07.360 --> 00:16:08.360
move a little bit faster.

285
00:16:08.559 --> 00:16:10.399
Well, it definite can move faster. I mean there's a

286
00:16:10.440 --> 00:16:12.120
lot about it. Banks have to be very measured in

287
00:16:12.159 --> 00:16:15.080
their approach to any new technology, especially AI. I mean,

288
00:16:15.120 --> 00:16:17.840
it's it's highly scrutinized, right, I mean, it's a little scary,

289
00:16:18.039 --> 00:16:20.360
I mean to be honest with you, right, you know,

290
00:16:20.600 --> 00:16:24.679
and we do good regulation and sound law around the

291
00:16:24.759 --> 00:16:27.639
use of AI, or it could go it could run amok, right,

292
00:16:27.759 --> 00:16:30.279
And so but you have the FinTechs that are able

293
00:16:30.320 --> 00:16:32.480
to move a little faster, and that's not bad for

294
00:16:32.519 --> 00:16:36.639
the banking industry as a whole, you know, as long

295
00:16:36.639 --> 00:16:39.240
as we can partner and work with these these organizations.

296
00:16:39.279 --> 00:16:41.799
There's also third party risk management issues that you know

297
00:16:41.919 --> 00:16:45.320
are abundantly you know, our banks are abundantly you know,

298
00:16:45.320 --> 00:16:49.440
supervised and examined for and we encourage that innovation and

299
00:16:49.440 --> 00:16:52.399
we but we have to be able to implement and

300
00:16:52.679 --> 00:16:55.320
you know, partner or build that to be able to

301
00:16:55.360 --> 00:16:58.759
do that ourselves as well. In order to make sure

302
00:16:58.799 --> 00:17:00.200
that we're able to do that, we need to be

303
00:17:00.720 --> 00:17:04.160
very very measured in our approach to regulation. That only

304
00:17:04.200 --> 00:17:09.440
affects you know, the banking industry and depository industries federally

305
00:17:09.519 --> 00:17:14.839
ensured you know, FDIC positive industries, but the fintech industry

306
00:17:14.880 --> 00:17:18.480
plays a very important role in getting us to the

307
00:17:18.519 --> 00:17:21.720
next level. And so we not saying that they shouldn't

308
00:17:21.759 --> 00:17:23.119
be able to do that. We just need to have

309
00:17:23.359 --> 00:17:24.039
far absolutely.

310
00:17:24.279 --> 00:17:26.319
Yeah, and I think fair lending particularly is an area

311
00:17:26.359 --> 00:17:29.799
that comes up frequently that in a traditional underwriting model

312
00:17:29.880 --> 00:17:33.200
is logistic regression whatever your you know, even table driven models,

313
00:17:33.279 --> 00:17:37.359
or it is easier to explain or at least it's

314
00:17:37.400 --> 00:17:40.240
already documented with the regulators. How do you examine a

315
00:17:40.279 --> 00:17:42.839
bank that is using a model like this? How do

316
00:17:42.880 --> 00:17:45.200
you examine a bank that is partnering with the fintech

317
00:17:45.240 --> 00:17:48.599
that uses AI and their underwriting much less clear and

318
00:17:48.640 --> 00:17:51.319
kind of gets back to your certainty, like the rules

319
00:17:51.319 --> 00:17:54.680
of the road aren't as clear. I think there's certainly

320
00:17:54.720 --> 00:17:58.839
a challenge with individual examiners not necessarily having the know

321
00:17:58.960 --> 00:18:01.440
how to do it, and I think there's an education

322
00:18:01.599 --> 00:18:04.359
challenge there that we're trying to This is a.

323
00:18:04.400 --> 00:18:06.279
Challenge in the current environment now too. I mean, you're

324
00:18:06.279 --> 00:18:09.640
seeing a lot of the regulators leave the agencies. A

325
00:18:09.640 --> 00:18:12.000
lot of the folks that were embedded within some of

326
00:18:12.039 --> 00:18:15.359
these financial institutions knew them how to historical context of

327
00:18:15.680 --> 00:18:19.880
the of the institution, and now we're seeing fewer and fewer,

328
00:18:19.960 --> 00:18:24.759
you know, team staff at the regulatory agencies. The examiner,

329
00:18:25.279 --> 00:18:27.519
the examiners are half of what they used to be.

330
00:18:28.519 --> 00:18:30.119
They have to be brought up to speed, and so

331
00:18:30.160 --> 00:18:33.119
it's important to have a really well educated, very informed

332
00:18:33.240 --> 00:18:37.079
regulatory exam staff in order to make sure that banks

333
00:18:37.119 --> 00:18:40.119
and FinTechs can get to these places and that they're

334
00:18:40.119 --> 00:18:44.079
not being halted on something that's misunderstood just because the

335
00:18:44.119 --> 00:18:49.279
regulator might not understand the process or the institution that's implementing.

336
00:18:49.759 --> 00:18:52.240
Absolutely, So, how do you know, as you think about

337
00:18:52.359 --> 00:18:55.000
your member banks, how do you advise kind of the

338
00:18:55.000 --> 00:18:57.880
business teams, the lending teams, the heads of innovation, the

339
00:18:57.920 --> 00:19:01.119
different different functional areas to work closely with their kind

340
00:19:01.119 --> 00:19:04.200
of legal and public affairs team to navigate what's happening

341
00:19:04.279 --> 00:19:05.400
right now in the market.

342
00:19:05.720 --> 00:19:09.480
We provide no advice to anyone. No, I mean, I

343
00:19:09.480 --> 00:19:11.680
mean quite clearly, I mean we're not. We're you know,

344
00:19:12.000 --> 00:19:14.160
we try to shape the policy that best suits our

345
00:19:14.200 --> 00:19:17.000
industry right and so, and we work very closely with

346
00:19:17.039 --> 00:19:19.880
the policy folks within our member institutions, the legal teams.

347
00:19:20.720 --> 00:19:22.160
You know, as a lawyer, I can say the lawyers

348
00:19:22.160 --> 00:19:25.519
probably you know, hold up most of these things for

349
00:19:26.200 --> 00:19:29.759
very when they shouldn't be. But you know that's what

350
00:19:29.799 --> 00:19:31.599
lawyers do, and that's what we pay them to be careful.

351
00:19:31.640 --> 00:19:36.640
But we you know, obviously it takes it takes a village,

352
00:19:36.880 --> 00:19:39.640
you know, to kind of push you know, an organization forward.

353
00:19:39.759 --> 00:19:42.640
And I think that you know, working closely with the

354
00:19:42.680 --> 00:19:45.839
policy especially the folks in d C and now more

355
00:19:45.880 --> 00:19:49.359
importantly you know, the state you know, policy folks and

356
00:19:49.400 --> 00:19:53.359
the legal teams is vital to the survival of some

357
00:19:53.400 --> 00:19:55.240
of these institutions and.

358
00:19:55.279 --> 00:19:57.119
Just to add to that, I think over the last

359
00:19:57.160 --> 00:19:59.640
four years, as difficult as some of the rules and

360
00:19:59.680 --> 00:20:03.119
regulartions coming out of the prior administration were for the industry,

361
00:20:03.599 --> 00:20:08.000
for especially the largest institutions, when the business lines really

362
00:20:08.000 --> 00:20:12.119
got a sense of the financial impact that one specific

363
00:20:12.319 --> 00:20:16.319
regulation among many would have on their ability to provide

364
00:20:16.359 --> 00:20:19.319
that product and innovate on that product at the level

365
00:20:19.359 --> 00:20:23.359
that their consumers expect, I think really heightened the pressure

366
00:20:23.839 --> 00:20:27.880
that corporate executives across the industry put on DC. And

367
00:20:27.920 --> 00:20:31.559
so you saw that Obviously government affairs and traditional lobbying

368
00:20:31.599 --> 00:20:34.440
was always a priority, but that really expanded to the

369
00:20:34.680 --> 00:20:39.200
public affairs ecosystem, and so you saw really historic levels

370
00:20:39.200 --> 00:20:45.920
of investment with digital advertising, grassroots coalitions, grasstops, which really

371
00:20:45.960 --> 00:20:52.839
means more paid stakeholder engagement. So identifying those small business

372
00:20:52.839 --> 00:20:55.160
owners or some of those think tanks that can speak

373
00:20:55.640 --> 00:20:59.079
on behalf of the industry. That really all revved up

374
00:20:59.160 --> 00:21:01.720
over the last four year years, and I think there's

375
00:21:01.759 --> 00:21:04.400
a perception that in many cases it was at least

376
00:21:04.400 --> 00:21:07.440
somewhat successful. And so I think that kind of atmosphere

377
00:21:07.519 --> 00:21:11.319
of the intersection between the business priorities outside of Washington,

378
00:21:11.799 --> 00:21:14.119
and the teams on the ground in terms of public

379
00:21:14.119 --> 00:21:18.200
affairs and government relations will continue regardless of who's in

380
00:21:18.200 --> 00:21:18.720
the White House.

381
00:21:18.960 --> 00:21:20.880
Great. Yeah, And I think we've certainly seen it on

382
00:21:20.920 --> 00:21:23.480
the fintech side of the world too. The American Fintech Council,

383
00:21:23.519 --> 00:21:25.599
which we're a founding member of we used to be

384
00:21:25.680 --> 00:21:29.480
the Marketplace Lenders Association, were actively engaged there. I know

385
00:21:29.519 --> 00:21:34.200
We've got a lot of some similar organizations that are

386
00:21:34.519 --> 00:21:38.720
doing similar work and partnering up on various initiatives. So

387
00:21:39.799 --> 00:21:42.640
I think it's it's definitely been a very very active

388
00:21:42.680 --> 00:21:45.119
few years and doesn't look like things are slowing down

389
00:21:45.119 --> 00:21:48.440
at all. So kind of last last thoughts are last

390
00:21:48.559 --> 00:21:51.559
question for the both of you. You know, any kind

391
00:21:51.559 --> 00:21:55.039
of bold or bold predictions, emerging issues, things that might

392
00:21:55.079 --> 00:21:57.680
surprise us for the year ahead, that that banks should

393
00:21:57.680 --> 00:22:02.960
be really preparing for, could both political and regulatory standpoint, like,

394
00:22:03.039 --> 00:22:05.000
is there you know, with the uncertainty, what could they

395
00:22:05.039 --> 00:22:07.720
prepare for to be ready for twenty twenty five?

396
00:22:08.359 --> 00:22:13.480
You want to start to sure, I'll take you.

397
00:22:13.559 --> 00:22:16.319
I'll take the Obviously, banks need to be able to

398
00:22:16.680 --> 00:22:19.559
our member institutions need to be able to pivot quickly,

399
00:22:20.200 --> 00:22:23.079
and I think us providing them with a little bit

400
00:22:23.079 --> 00:22:24.960
of the kind of signals of where things are going

401
00:22:24.960 --> 00:22:27.640
with some of the rulemakings and other things will be

402
00:22:27.680 --> 00:22:30.000
helpful for them. But it's going it's it's just kind

403
00:22:30.039 --> 00:22:35.279
of a new era. We're very dedicated to stopping that

404
00:22:35.319 --> 00:22:38.119
pendulum swing between administrations. I think that we're going to

405
00:22:38.119 --> 00:22:40.119
see a pretty big pendulum swing for the next two

406
00:22:40.160 --> 00:22:43.640
years at least because Congress. They have majorities in Congress

407
00:22:43.640 --> 00:22:46.119
and that might change in two years, and so they're

408
00:22:46.119 --> 00:22:49.680
going to have a pretty healthy agenda going forward. So

409
00:22:49.720 --> 00:22:52.240
it will be an interesting couple of years. I think

410
00:22:52.240 --> 00:22:57.880
banks will enjoy some deregulation of in some wind back,

411
00:22:58.000 --> 00:23:00.400
wind down of some of these more egregious rules that

412
00:23:00.440 --> 00:23:03.640
we're quite honestly outside the authority of the regulators to

413
00:23:03.680 --> 00:23:07.960
even promagate. But it's going to be We're going to

414
00:23:08.039 --> 00:23:12.000
have to be very nimble right and be flexible about

415
00:23:12.000 --> 00:23:14.319
our approach to how we're working with our regulars. But

416
00:23:14.599 --> 00:23:16.359
I think we also need to advocate for what we

417
00:23:16.400 --> 00:23:19.400
need the regulators for, and that is for to make

418
00:23:19.440 --> 00:23:21.720
sure that the system is working, that we have level

419
00:23:21.720 --> 00:23:25.359
playing fields, and that you know, quite honestly that you know,

420
00:23:25.599 --> 00:23:29.160
we're proud of being the most regulated, are heavily regulated,

421
00:23:29.519 --> 00:23:32.880
heavily supervised industry because you know, we were there for

422
00:23:32.960 --> 00:23:36.200
the American public. It needs to be well regulated, well supervised,

423
00:23:36.200 --> 00:23:37.559
and so hopefully we'll get back to some of that.

424
00:23:38.000 --> 00:23:39.720
Yeah, just to add to what Dave said, I think

425
00:23:40.440 --> 00:23:43.119
a lot of institutions right now in the financial services

426
00:23:43.119 --> 00:23:47.440
space are, especially for reputational risks, trying to stay a

427
00:23:47.440 --> 00:23:49.880
little bit more in the background, which is obviously an

428
00:23:49.880 --> 00:23:52.839
intentional choice. We'll see if they're able to continue to

429
00:23:52.920 --> 00:23:54.599
do that, and a lot of that depends on the

430
00:23:54.599 --> 00:23:58.799
political environment. From a policy perspective, I think banks and

431
00:23:58.880 --> 00:24:03.240
credit unions and FinTechs need to be prepared for what

432
00:24:03.400 --> 00:24:06.599
seems to be more likely instance or a more likely

433
00:24:07.880 --> 00:24:13.200
instance of legal framework being put around crypto and stable coins. Peers.

434
00:24:13.200 --> 00:24:16.400
There's bipartisan consensus in the House and Senate to advance that,

435
00:24:16.759 --> 00:24:21.440
and obviously you saw in the President's campaign huge coalition

436
00:24:21.799 --> 00:24:26.759
of crypto and stable coin influencers and leaders, and that

437
00:24:26.880 --> 00:24:31.000
seems to be something that is going to make progress

438
00:24:31.000 --> 00:24:31.799
in the months to come.

439
00:24:31.960 --> 00:24:34.759
Awesome. Well, thank you, thanks Dave, Thanks Billy, appreciate you

440
00:24:34.880 --> 00:24:37.119
being on the podcast Today US