April 19, 2023

The Regulatory Outlook at CBA Live

With new regulations on the horizon — what do these changes mean for your institution? https://www.linkedin.com/in/dan-smith-31abaa10/, EVP, Head of Regulatory Affairs at the https://www.consumerbankers.com/, has the answers in this rundown from the...

Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player icon

With new regulations on the horizon — what do these changes mean for your institution?

Dan Smith, EVP, Head of Regulatory Affairs at the Consumer Bankers Association, has the answers in this rundown from the CBA LIVE conference.

The banking world runs on rulebooks, and with unprecedented events such as the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, additional chapters are in rapid development to get ahead of the Congressional Review Act in April/May of 2023.

Join us as we discuss:

  • Section 1071 and its implications for small-business lending
  • Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act for consumer access to financial records
  • The proposal for lowering credit card late fees
WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.879 --> 00:00:07.799
You're listening to leaders and lending from
Upstart, a podcast dedicated to helping consumer

2
00:00:07.879 --> 00:00:13.519
lenders grow their programs and improve their
product offerings. Each week, here decision

3
00:00:13.519 --> 00:00:17.600
makers in the finance industry offer insights
into the future of the lending industry,

4
00:00:18.039 --> 00:00:22.839
best practices around digital transformation, and
more. Let's get into the show.

5
00:00:23.440 --> 00:00:27.960
Welcome to the podcast. I'm joined
today by Dan Smith the Consumer Bankers Association.

6
00:00:28.039 --> 00:00:30.120
Dan, thanks for making the time
and joining us today. Thanks for

7
00:00:30.160 --> 00:00:33.759
having me. Yeah, we're here
at the CBA Live conference. Thank you

8
00:00:33.799 --> 00:00:36.320
for osen us. This has been
fabulous. Tell me a little bit about

9
00:00:36.359 --> 00:00:39.399
the conference, the goals, how
it's going so far this year. It's

10
00:00:39.439 --> 00:00:45.399
been fantastic. Gets our second one
s COVID. We're north of sixteen hundred

11
00:00:45.359 --> 00:00:52.079
attendees, over seven hundred bankers.
It's such a great opportunity to sit down

12
00:00:52.640 --> 00:00:56.960
and talk and meet with people,
allow them to network and learn from each

13
00:00:56.960 --> 00:01:00.880
other. We have some great sponsors
and vendors. Your every day you see

14
00:01:00.880 --> 00:01:06.359
the conversations going on where people are
learning from each other, sharing information.

15
00:01:06.439 --> 00:01:11.560
It's such a great opportunity to freew
people together and talk about banking, talking

16
00:01:11.599 --> 00:01:15.760
about financial services, the industry,
what are the challenges they face. So

17
00:01:15.959 --> 00:01:21.480
we're really excited it's going. Well, I'm getting a little tired already,

18
00:01:21.560 --> 00:01:26.400
but you know, about a couple
more days. But it's got a lot

19
00:01:26.439 --> 00:01:29.400
of images. Yeah, it's felt
as I've talked to bankers who are here

20
00:01:29.439 --> 00:01:34.719
and others in the industry exceptionally timely
this year given the disruptions in the market

21
00:01:34.079 --> 00:01:38.560
both I mean, got interest rate
issues, You've got the collapse of Silicon

22
00:01:38.599 --> 00:01:41.920
Valley Bank. It's like everybody's trying
to figure out is there contagion? Is

23
00:01:41.959 --> 00:01:44.599
there not? What do I do? What's the is there a recession on

24
00:01:44.599 --> 00:01:47.280
the Jurado I logged on my balance
sheet? What am I doing about to

25
00:01:47.319 --> 00:01:49.920
pot? I mean, it's like
a moment when people really need the community

26
00:01:49.920 --> 00:01:53.840
and to talk through some of the
pretty substantial issues facing facing the space.

27
00:01:53.959 --> 00:01:56.799
Yeah, we've had to pivot a
little bit of change our agenda on the

28
00:01:56.840 --> 00:02:00.680
fly a couple of times to make
sure we address those things as best week

29
00:02:00.680 --> 00:02:05.840
can and to provide the opportunity for
conversation around these really important issues for thank

30
00:02:05.879 --> 00:02:08.000
you and our customers. Yeah,
I don't even think it's the agenda.

31
00:02:08.039 --> 00:02:10.520
So much is just people sitting in
the room, whether it's in the committee

32
00:02:10.560 --> 00:02:13.800
meetings or in the hallways between going
hey, wait, what are you guys

33
00:02:13.800 --> 00:02:15.879
seeing? I was having a fascinating
discussion with some of the folks from the

34
00:02:15.879 --> 00:02:20.599
small business can be talking about the
risks of fraud with the number of inflows

35
00:02:20.599 --> 00:02:23.400
and outflows of deposits as people try
and find what they think of as to

36
00:02:23.439 --> 00:02:27.120
save haven and they go last like
a moment when but now I'm worried about

37
00:02:27.159 --> 00:02:29.439
FLAUD because I've got so much more
activity in the space than it can be

38
00:02:29.479 --> 00:02:31.879
easier to get for fraud and activity
to get lost or for people to find

39
00:02:31.879 --> 00:02:36.120
it's time to take advantage. So
it's I think it's a fascinating time to

40
00:02:36.159 --> 00:02:40.199
have those conversations happening. Yeah,
when we started that first weekend, we're

41
00:02:40.280 --> 00:02:45.479
trying to figure out how does CBA
a value to its members and it's it's

42
00:02:45.520 --> 00:02:50.159
collaboration, it's convening. And the
thing we were hearing was brought and it

43
00:02:50.240 --> 00:02:53.639
wasn't actually happening. It was a
risk of it, right, and so

44
00:02:53.680 --> 00:02:55.840
we're trying to make sure that we
hear what's going on, work with our

45
00:02:55.879 --> 00:03:04.560
regulators, try to stay on the
forefront of rising issues, potential problems.

46
00:03:05.120 --> 00:03:07.199
Yeah, yeah, that's great.
So I want to talk a little about

47
00:03:07.319 --> 00:03:12.199
legislative priorities and what you mean you
kind of work with legislative affairs the US

48
00:03:12.280 --> 00:03:15.800
government. There's a lot of questions
around the future of regulation after SPB,

49
00:03:15.879 --> 00:03:20.560
but I feel like that's maybe an
overdone topic in a little too recent to

50
00:03:20.599 --> 00:03:23.840
really know where the t leaves are
going to settle on that. Lots of

51
00:03:23.879 --> 00:03:27.439
people suggesting things are going to happen, but I'm not sure that we know

52
00:03:27.479 --> 00:03:30.919
what to expect yet. Well,
it's early. There's a lot of conversations

53
00:03:30.919 --> 00:03:36.639
in Washington around remedies. What was
the cause? Right, the root cause

54
00:03:36.680 --> 00:03:39.080
of a problem? Yep? Is
it isolated? We're gonna have a lot

55
00:03:39.080 --> 00:03:44.439
of pugressional hearings. Yeah, I
think regulators are going to do some horizontal

56
00:03:44.520 --> 00:03:52.840
reviews particular segments of the market,
some self evaluation regulatory agencies, Yeah,

57
00:03:53.080 --> 00:03:58.360
trying to figure out is this an
issue that is systemic which we don't believe

58
00:03:58.520 --> 00:04:04.439
at all, is the as how
do we look at this this was unique?

59
00:04:04.639 --> 00:04:10.599
And how do we look at our
risk management as institute? She's but

60
00:04:10.719 --> 00:04:15.639
also regulators to account for these type
of things and the run on the bank

61
00:04:15.719 --> 00:04:18.319
how fast? Yeah, twenty five
percent there deposits in one day. I

62
00:04:18.319 --> 00:04:23.360
mean that's a that's a liquidity event
that almost no bank is really expecting her

63
00:04:23.839 --> 00:04:27.040
trying to prepare. And that's not
in the range of like things that might

64
00:04:27.079 --> 00:04:30.240
happen, that's not really on my
risk management less things to be prepared for.

65
00:04:30.399 --> 00:04:33.040
And she's a very difficult situation.
Banks have you know, a game

66
00:04:33.079 --> 00:04:38.240
plan a book like if this happens, open up the book. Well,

67
00:04:38.399 --> 00:04:41.759
we have created a new book now, or at least at a new chapter.

68
00:04:41.920 --> 00:04:45.319
That's right. When somebody tweets what
do we do? So the whole

69
00:04:45.360 --> 00:04:49.079
New world interested, But there is
I mean maybe the agency that has the

70
00:04:49.079 --> 00:04:53.680
most going on in terms of rulemaking
and to the regulators already changes is the

71
00:04:53.720 --> 00:04:57.240
CFPB. So talk a little about
what the priorities you see coming out of

72
00:04:57.560 --> 00:05:00.240
the cfpbum from real hid show bro, Like, what do you expect to

73
00:05:00.240 --> 00:05:03.920
see and I know their specific legislation. We should dive into our rulemaking things

74
00:05:03.920 --> 00:05:05.879
that are going on. So just
gimerally, what do you see as the

75
00:05:05.879 --> 00:05:09.519
priority is to starting to people dive
into some specifics. So what I like

76
00:05:09.639 --> 00:05:15.399
to tell people is think about the
clock and the calendar, and we have

77
00:05:16.480 --> 00:05:21.040
an election in the follows coming up. It's coming up now that the director

78
00:05:21.560 --> 00:05:27.680
it can be fired at will.
It sort of changes how that director looks

79
00:05:27.720 --> 00:05:32.000
at their time there, and so
that the clock starts ticking and they start

80
00:05:32.079 --> 00:05:38.079
working their way backwards to when what's
known as the Congressional Review Acts. There's

81
00:05:38.079 --> 00:05:42.639
a period of time then in Congress
as his ability to review final rules,

82
00:05:43.120 --> 00:05:48.879
and it's roughly sixty legislative days after
publishing in the Federal Register. Okay,

83
00:05:48.959 --> 00:05:54.240
so everybody's guessing what is that date, So it's roughly April and May of

84
00:05:54.360 --> 00:05:59.480
twenty four that a rule has to
be fine by that point to clear the

85
00:05:59.639 --> 00:06:03.680
urdle of the Congressional Review Apps.
So when Donald Trunk came in, they

86
00:06:03.959 --> 00:06:10.079
repealed the use of Congressional Review Act
to repeal several rules, right, and

87
00:06:10.160 --> 00:06:14.839
so they want to make sure that
whatever they're working on now is final by

88
00:06:15.040 --> 00:06:18.439
let's say March or April, so
they avoid the Congressional review. A clock

89
00:06:18.560 --> 00:06:24.600
is ticking, clock is ticking.
So you got three rules that are in

90
00:06:24.600 --> 00:06:30.519
in a final stage or in close
enough to make this shot. Get the

91
00:06:30.519 --> 00:06:32.360
shot up where the clock runs out
that's right, and it's a race to

92
00:06:32.439 --> 00:06:36.959
that clock. Right, So we
have ten seventy one small business data collection.

93
00:06:38.040 --> 00:06:40.480
It's going to drop in the next
couple of days. It has to

94
00:06:41.120 --> 00:06:46.319
because of the court case in California, and they set a date. Court

95
00:06:46.360 --> 00:06:50.759
did by March thirty first, so
we'll have ten seventy one final. The

96
00:06:50.800 --> 00:06:59.360
Bureau is clearly indicated ten thirty three
the consumer access to final records that we

97
00:06:59.360 --> 00:07:04.000
will see a proposal in the fall, with a final rule likely in January

98
00:07:04.160 --> 00:07:10.879
February, giving him enough time before
the deadline perceived it. And then the

99
00:07:10.920 --> 00:07:15.160
credit card late b proposal that the
NPRM noticed. The proposal will make is

100
00:07:15.199 --> 00:07:24.079
out that a comment period on that
will end roughly end of April. We

101
00:07:24.199 --> 00:07:29.959
are anticipating probably a final rule in
the fall. The director has been pretty

102
00:07:30.000 --> 00:07:33.040
clear in its timing up things,
which I'll give me credit. That's not

103
00:07:33.120 --> 00:07:36.879
a typical thing of the agency.
You don't know when a rule is going

104
00:07:36.920 --> 00:07:41.160
to be final or where their attent
is. Yep, he's been pretty clear

105
00:07:41.199 --> 00:07:44.959
about that. He talks about being
transparent. We may not agree with some

106
00:07:45.000 --> 00:07:47.000
of the things he decides, what
he's pretty transparent on what he's thinking on

107
00:07:47.079 --> 00:07:51.279
what he's thinking in the time he
plants execute things. Well, gotta appreciate

108
00:07:51.319 --> 00:07:57.279
that. Yeah, I guess.
I guess if I have to appreciate that,

109
00:07:57.439 --> 00:07:59.759
I'll take that one. Yeah.
That's it's saying. You know,

110
00:08:00.399 --> 00:08:01.879
well, let's dive into these let's
talk about ten seventy one. What do

111
00:08:01.920 --> 00:08:05.160
you what do you expect the outcome
of that to be, and what do

112
00:08:05.160 --> 00:08:07.240
you think the impact for the industry
is going to be. It's gonna be

113
00:08:07.279 --> 00:08:11.240
an interesting shift, enormous. It's
an enormous undertaking that every institution, not

114
00:08:11.360 --> 00:08:13.959
just banks, are going to go
for it, and they do any small

115
00:08:15.000 --> 00:08:18.839
business to game changer. We're expecting
the rule, as I said, to

116
00:08:18.839 --> 00:08:24.920
come out very soon, where we
anticipate not too many changes from the post.

117
00:08:26.360 --> 00:08:31.679
I think it's gonna be pretty much
the same. We have some serious

118
00:08:31.720 --> 00:08:37.960
concerns, but I think the biggest
challenge will be the implementation timeline. So

119
00:08:37.039 --> 00:08:41.879
in the proposal they were going to
give eighteen months. That will be nearly

120
00:08:41.960 --> 00:08:46.840
impossible, and we've been telling the
Bureau of that. You think about small

121
00:08:46.879 --> 00:08:50.399
business lending, it's not like mortgage, where a bank will have a mortgage

122
00:08:50.480 --> 00:08:56.399
operation viewing it and all of the
mortgages are run through that small business happens

123
00:08:56.440 --> 00:09:01.559
across the entire bank in different places. Yeah, So they first have to

124
00:09:01.600 --> 00:09:05.600
align and communicate their operating systems,
and then they have to standardize the definitions

125
00:09:05.600 --> 00:09:09.559
of the data they're going to collect. So it's a data collection like HOMDA

126
00:09:09.600 --> 00:09:15.720
for borkages, and so they have
to standardize how it's all defined. They

127
00:09:15.720 --> 00:09:18.840
have to change all their systems.
They got to collect all that data,

128
00:09:18.919 --> 00:09:22.200
and then the heart part starts because
then they start evaluating the data for what

129
00:09:22.240 --> 00:09:26.799
it means in terms of fair lending
or in fair banking. That brings in

130
00:09:26.840 --> 00:09:31.840
a whole nother discussion, but that's
post operational challenges. So I think that

131
00:09:31.840 --> 00:09:35.559
that's the big thing. You're going
to rely upon your core processors. You're

132
00:09:35.559 --> 00:09:39.240
going to have to make an enormous
amount of changes to your systems. And

133
00:09:39.320 --> 00:09:46.000
by the way, there's probably going
to be a CRA updates to the Reinvestment

134
00:09:46.039 --> 00:09:50.159
Act at the same time, which
is an enormous undertaking. Another type another

135
00:09:50.240 --> 00:09:56.200
large technology and data undertaking in itself, the small business data collection is enormous,

136
00:09:56.279 --> 00:10:01.320
and we are working really hard to
help the bureau understand those challenges.

137
00:10:01.919 --> 00:10:03.600
How do you think eighteen months is
just not enough time for a lot of

138
00:10:03.600 --> 00:10:07.000
these institutions. What do you think
the right timeline it like, how long

139
00:10:07.039 --> 00:10:11.440
will literally take banks to be ready, minimum twenty four months, but even

140
00:10:11.559 --> 00:10:15.600
then you're going to have pieces that
aren't going to work great. You're going

141
00:10:15.639 --> 00:10:22.519
to have data collection errors and problems
until you What we hope the Bureau does

142
00:10:22.600 --> 00:10:26.879
is if they're going to stick with
the twenty four or the eighteen months,

143
00:10:26.879 --> 00:10:31.240
that they stagger implementation. Right.
They've done this in the past where they

144
00:10:31.240 --> 00:10:33.360
said, Okay, the big guys
you need to be ready in eighteen months,

145
00:10:33.639 --> 00:10:37.600
and then the middle guys you got
thirty six and the little guys you

146
00:10:37.679 --> 00:10:41.200
got forty eight months to be or
they can stagger the type of data or

147
00:10:41.240 --> 00:10:48.240
the disclosure of a data. So
we're optimistic can hopefully they will consider this

148
00:10:48.279 --> 00:10:52.879
and we will continue to educate them
on the challenges. They know. It's

149
00:10:52.919 --> 00:10:56.240
hard. Yep, there's that clock
ticky. Yeah. Yeah. The other

150
00:10:56.279 --> 00:11:01.919
thing that I'm always curious about is
what comes next in terms of to so

151
00:11:01.000 --> 00:11:05.519
many. One is kind of about
the collection and the reporting of this data,

152
00:11:05.600 --> 00:11:07.039
but then there's the like, now, are we happy with what it

153
00:11:07.080 --> 00:11:09.840
says, if not, what do
we do? What are the standards that

154
00:11:09.879 --> 00:11:13.279
apply to what we expect? What
is the fair lending standard? Once we

155
00:11:13.320 --> 00:11:16.360
have this data, how do we
know if we're in a good place or

156
00:11:16.360 --> 00:11:18.000
a bad place? Even sense of
what's going to happen on that front.

157
00:11:18.080 --> 00:11:22.799
That feels like the real changes we
theoretically want to make come from knowing the

158
00:11:22.840 --> 00:11:26.360
data, not from just collecting it. It's like that kind of starts the

159
00:11:26.799 --> 00:11:28.360
real process of because there are changes
to the industry we need to make.

160
00:11:30.000 --> 00:11:33.080
It will shine a light on small
business lending that we've never seen before,

161
00:11:33.720 --> 00:11:37.720
and so that's probably the upsiders we'll
be able to see that data will all

162
00:11:37.759 --> 00:11:39.799
be able to see. It's publicly
disclosed. Yep, we can see where

163
00:11:39.840 --> 00:11:45.799
there's gaps that brings in regulatory risk
their lending risk, for sure. But

164
00:11:45.840 --> 00:11:48.279
at least we know what it is, where are there gaps and how and

165
00:11:48.399 --> 00:11:54.360
we facilitate better lending in communities that
need it the most. Are there clear

166
00:11:54.399 --> 00:11:56.559
standards on what the fair lending expectations
will be, like how we're going to

167
00:11:56.600 --> 00:12:01.720
measure what's good what's bad on the
space hide I mean, they're always actually

168
00:12:01.759 --> 00:12:03.960
to me on the consumer side.
But I would say you have to look

169
00:12:03.960 --> 00:12:07.080
at the hum to rule. You
just figure humed is the same thing small

170
00:12:07.120 --> 00:12:11.240
bits. It ras election for mortgages. This is data collection for small business

171
00:12:11.320 --> 00:12:15.360
offices. So that's how you should
look at it. Now, it may

172
00:12:15.399 --> 00:12:20.840
not be apples to apples, but
it's a really good comparison for an institution.

173
00:12:20.840 --> 00:12:24.120
All right, ten to seventy one, that's going to be interesting times.

174
00:12:24.519 --> 00:12:26.440
Next one you meant ten thirty three, I gotta like, I don't

175
00:12:26.440 --> 00:12:28.320
have all the numbers the back.
I got a certain numbers in the back

176
00:12:28.360 --> 00:12:31.120
of my head and I don't have
them all. But this data aggregation concept.

177
00:12:31.679 --> 00:12:35.279
Talk to me about what this rule
is. First for the audience members

178
00:12:35.279 --> 00:12:37.879
that may not be as familiar,
and then where it's at sure, so

179
00:12:37.519 --> 00:12:41.440
section ten thirty three of the Dodd
Frank GAC that's that's where the number comes

180
00:12:41.440 --> 00:12:46.679
from. It's a page wall,
it's a readable, there's a readable.

181
00:12:46.759 --> 00:12:50.600
Five is now writing a rule that
will probably be north of a thousand pages

182
00:12:50.879 --> 00:12:54.399
based on the one page is going
to be a lot of fun, But

183
00:12:54.559 --> 00:13:00.559
only a filmal regulator to do that. It basically says the consumers ship should

184
00:13:00.600 --> 00:13:05.279
have access to their financial records.
That makes sense, that's it. The

185
00:13:05.399 --> 00:13:11.679
rules will be much different than now
because there are new entities in the market,

186
00:13:11.840 --> 00:13:18.399
data aggregators such as BLAD for example. Yeah, who can gather the

187
00:13:18.440 --> 00:13:24.279
information from the bank, from the
credit card company, from the holder of

188
00:13:24.320 --> 00:13:30.720
that information, take it and provide
it to third parties. And then there's

189
00:13:30.759 --> 00:13:35.559
the third party and that could be
anybody that has the consumer's permission, So

190
00:13:35.559 --> 00:13:41.360
it's all consumer permission down missions information. It will change the way the market

191
00:13:41.399 --> 00:13:46.320
operates because it's in the concept of
open banking. It's not true open banking

192
00:13:46.519 --> 00:13:50.440
as in Europe, but it has
a lot of characteristics. What are the

193
00:13:50.440 --> 00:13:52.840
differences for me? I mean,
I'm very familiar, not very plied,

194
00:13:52.879 --> 00:13:56.559
but the concept of open banking in
Europe where I really have to provide the

195
00:13:56.639 --> 00:14:00.240
data in a machine readable format for
interoperability, that's a really interesting idea.

196
00:14:00.279 --> 00:14:03.240
What's the difference between what's being proposed
in ten thirty three and so the people

197
00:14:03.240 --> 00:14:09.399
what's in your out so you don't
know and she got it doesn't spell it

198
00:14:09.440 --> 00:14:13.159
out like they do in Europe.
Right, it's as I said, access

199
00:14:13.159 --> 00:14:16.840
to financial records and what the bureau
does, how they expand that is going

200
00:14:16.879 --> 00:14:22.159
to be very interesting. Uh,
you know they're they're talking about establishment of

201
00:14:22.279 --> 00:14:28.720
epis rather than screen scraping. Yeah, so it's going to change the market

202
00:14:28.960 --> 00:14:39.279
in many aspects. We're concerned that
the uh data that's being moved around needs

203
00:14:39.320 --> 00:14:43.240
to be very secure for sure.
The players in that ecosystem need to have

204
00:14:43.320 --> 00:14:48.159
the same standards of security and oversight, which they don't have. Uh.

205
00:14:48.840 --> 00:14:54.840
Uh. Data they're sending is very
sensitive. Um. And if it's going

206
00:14:54.919 --> 00:15:03.000
to be a true open banking world, it really shouldn't incorporate financially institutions data

207
00:15:03.000 --> 00:15:09.399
of all kinds. Right now,
the outline only covers bank transaction information and

208
00:15:09.519 --> 00:15:15.200
credit card information. So if you
get your auto loan from a captive auto

209
00:15:15.320 --> 00:15:18.720
lender, let's say VW Right whoever, they are not going to have to

210
00:15:20.000 --> 00:15:22.840
comply with this. Interesting, So
you're gonna have segments of the market that

211
00:15:24.159 --> 00:15:28.879
don't aren't held accountable as the banks
and credit card companies quicken loans. There

212
00:15:28.919 --> 00:15:35.200
are non banks, this will not
apply to them. A lot of mortgage

213
00:15:35.240 --> 00:15:37.639
has gone through and so the non
bank lendingsumer is going to assume that they're

214
00:15:37.639 --> 00:15:43.440
getting all that their information. They're
not, So it's a complex, really

215
00:15:43.559 --> 00:15:50.639
market shifting um rule, and there's
a lot of challenges to it and risks

216
00:15:50.799 --> 00:15:54.360
associated with it as well. I
imagine too there's the question of like how

217
00:15:54.399 --> 00:15:56.919
good is the compliance and security on
the receiving side. Mean, just because

218
00:15:56.919 --> 00:16:00.039
the consumer says I want you to
share my with this party does not mean

219
00:16:00.360 --> 00:16:04.399
the consumers done full diligence. Because
I've been screaming about that for a while.

220
00:16:04.840 --> 00:16:11.159
How do we know that X fintech
company has the systems in place to

221
00:16:11.200 --> 00:16:15.440
secure that data? We don't.
And there's no federal agency with oversight that

222
00:16:15.519 --> 00:16:18.360
can go in and look. The
CFBB can't go knock on the door and

223
00:16:18.399 --> 00:16:22.519
say, show me how you're complying
with this rule. They can do an

224
00:16:22.639 --> 00:16:27.159
enforcement investigation, but they can't examine
active basis. So we're we've been pushing

225
00:16:27.200 --> 00:16:30.960
the bureau to look at that.
We think it's a system that they need

226
00:16:32.000 --> 00:16:37.000
to think about that. Plus liability
also the shift in if there's a breach,

227
00:16:37.399 --> 00:16:40.480
So if the bank's holding all this
sense of infigation and somebody acts the

228
00:16:40.480 --> 00:16:44.879
bank, there's a liability there.
If that same data goes to a data

229
00:16:44.919 --> 00:16:48.919
aggregator or to a third party,
and there's a breach. Where's the consumer

230
00:16:48.960 --> 00:16:52.519
going to turn? Are they going
to go to the data aggregator or we

231
00:16:52.600 --> 00:16:56.639
go to the bank exactly. Yeah, so we don't think that's the right

232
00:16:56.639 --> 00:16:59.120
approach to either. If you have
the data all the day, help we

233
00:16:59.120 --> 00:17:02.080
should be responsible. We would halt
accountable for Yeah, it just seems interesting

234
00:17:02.120 --> 00:17:04.519
to me because it's reminds me of
you know, when that I want to

235
00:17:04.519 --> 00:17:08.759
go back to the clops BESTVB.
But there was a threat of conversation that

236
00:17:08.880 --> 00:17:11.599
was following this. So, well, depositors deserve what they got because it

237
00:17:11.640 --> 00:17:15.400
was their job to look into the
proper asset management of their bank, Like

238
00:17:15.799 --> 00:17:19.079
like the depositors were looking at the
quarterly filings to figure out what kind of

239
00:17:19.119 --> 00:17:23.200
assets the banks have bought they were
the safety and soundness oversight was going to

240
00:17:23.240 --> 00:17:26.079
come from depositors looking at them.
So that's kind of ridiculous. And here

241
00:17:26.119 --> 00:17:29.519
you kind of going, well,
the consumer will look in. They won't

242
00:17:29.720 --> 00:17:32.799
ask the bank to transfer their data
to an unsafe party. It's the consumers

243
00:17:32.799 --> 00:17:37.759
responsibility. Will maybe the consumers it's
not owning that responsibility the same way we

244
00:17:37.880 --> 00:17:40.759
might think is critical and the context
of this kind of information, the same

245
00:17:40.799 --> 00:17:44.279
way the bank would be held accountable
to a regulator to do. I think

246
00:17:44.279 --> 00:17:47.400
that's if we think the consumer is
going to be the oversight line of defense

247
00:17:47.440 --> 00:17:49.680
for their data not ending up in
unsafe places. That's probably a bit like

248
00:17:49.720 --> 00:17:53.240
asking your depositors to make sure that
your bank is making sound risk management dicisiences.

249
00:17:53.559 --> 00:18:00.960
It's really not the right oversight mechanism
in place. Yes, where who?

250
00:18:00.119 --> 00:18:06.359
We hope that the Bureau will factor
that into their rule. I guess

251
00:18:06.400 --> 00:18:11.720
we'll find out over the next few
months. Your other area was the overdraft

252
00:18:11.799 --> 00:18:15.160
credit card late fees overdraft fees section
of role machias. Talk a little bit

253
00:18:15.160 --> 00:18:18.559
about what's going on in that space. Sure, So the Bureau has proposed

254
00:18:18.720 --> 00:18:25.039
a rule to lower the safe harbor
on credit card lea. So the Febble

255
00:18:25.119 --> 00:18:30.480
Reserve about a decade ago said,
if you're going to charge safe harb a

256
00:18:30.559 --> 00:18:33.240
late Yep, We're going to establish
a safe harbor that says, if you

257
00:18:33.319 --> 00:18:41.279
charge x amount, no matter what
you do, there is no risk of

258
00:18:41.759 --> 00:18:45.440
being sued on that. We've we've
created the safe harb. The Bureau has

259
00:18:45.480 --> 00:18:52.279
decided to take a fresh look at
it and decided at the moment proposed to

260
00:18:52.839 --> 00:19:00.680
lower the safe harbor from currently a
thirty one dollars down to eight dollars.

261
00:19:02.279 --> 00:19:10.680
Wow, so dramatic reduction and big
reduction. It will have a significant impact

262
00:19:11.319 --> 00:19:15.079
on the market credit card market,
for sure. We believe it will have

263
00:19:15.240 --> 00:19:22.319
ramifications for some consumers. Certain segments
of the market will be impacted more than

264
00:19:22.440 --> 00:19:30.960
others. They Bureau does not really
address the deterrent factor of a late,

265
00:19:30.759 --> 00:19:37.359
so you run the risk of consumers
failing to pay their monthly payment, which

266
00:19:37.559 --> 00:19:42.039
more commonly because they why should I
have two bills do and one's got a

267
00:19:42.039 --> 00:19:47.920
penalty and the other doesn't. I'm
gonna pay the late, But as you

268
00:19:48.000 --> 00:19:51.720
wait for thirty plus days, you're
delinquent and you're gonna get recorded to your

269
00:19:51.720 --> 00:19:53.720
credit bureau, so your credit score
is going to go down. But I'm

270
00:19:53.759 --> 00:19:57.880
not sure every consumer understands that.
I'm sure they don't. At least some

271
00:19:59.000 --> 00:20:03.559
number of them do, right,
So we believe that, you know,

272
00:20:03.720 --> 00:20:08.160
this should be a very thoughtful process, data driven analysis, or we're not

273
00:20:08.200 --> 00:20:15.079
sure the Bureau has done a very
effective job at analyzing the data and accurately

274
00:20:15.720 --> 00:20:23.480
calculating the collection costs involved. And
so we will be encouraging the bureau to

275
00:20:25.319 --> 00:20:30.160
take a closer look at how they're
analyzing the impact on consumers. There's also,

276
00:20:30.279 --> 00:20:33.279
in my mind always this question of
kind of second order impacts, like

277
00:20:33.599 --> 00:20:37.880
what happens to the approval rates,
who gets access to credit cards or the

278
00:20:37.880 --> 00:20:40.599
lines of credit that are issued when
when these things change, it's not just

279
00:20:40.640 --> 00:20:42.640
like well, it's kind of like
I want to get too politically here,

280
00:20:42.680 --> 00:20:45.160
but I guess I'm talking about leegedly, but like you see rank control,

281
00:20:45.240 --> 00:20:48.000
Like there's the impact that the people
who are paying rent, and there's the

282
00:20:48.039 --> 00:20:53.279
impact on building housing, the amount
of stock that becomes available because of the

283
00:20:53.319 --> 00:20:56.599
prices that can be charged. In
an analogy, and that's tough. The

284
00:20:56.920 --> 00:21:00.960
balloon, when you squeeze it all
one side, it's got it's gotta go

285
00:21:00.000 --> 00:21:04.680
out there other So what will happen? There's a lot of possible things.

286
00:21:04.720 --> 00:21:10.759
There could be increase in the interest
rate over charge to sure right, there

287
00:21:10.839 --> 00:21:17.119
would be a clow scene of dormant
accounts. So if you havn't used your

288
00:21:17.160 --> 00:21:21.079
account and shut that, shut it
down, shut it down. You could

289
00:21:21.079 --> 00:21:25.519
decide and likely opping is you won't
decide who you're going to actually extend credit

290
00:21:25.559 --> 00:21:27.680
to the reduced number of people you're
doing credit and how much right, and

291
00:21:27.799 --> 00:21:33.319
if you think that group is a
riskier and may not either bills may not

292
00:21:33.480 --> 00:21:38.799
extended them credit. Yeah. So
it's a fascinating time in the credit cards

293
00:21:38.960 --> 00:21:42.599
Mose. Yeah. Yeah, it
feels to be like so much government policy

294
00:21:42.720 --> 00:21:48.480
ends up not understanding the second order
effects and optimizing for a first order of

295
00:21:48.559 --> 00:21:55.240
fact and occasionally not calculating the second
order the law of unattended consequences or whatever

296
00:21:55.240 --> 00:22:03.039
it may be. I think regulators
really shouldn't do is um combine regulatory policy

297
00:22:03.240 --> 00:22:10.480
and politics. It gets messy.
We've seated in the penest that when you

298
00:22:10.559 --> 00:22:15.279
do that can really mess things up. Yeah, so that is one of

299
00:22:15.279 --> 00:22:19.079
the biggest risks with regulatory interventions that
day they look at it from a political

300
00:22:19.160 --> 00:22:25.680
as rather than a safety and sound
and sewer protection at large. Yeah.

301
00:22:25.759 --> 00:22:30.039
So if you're talking to members bankers
who are then saying, hey, there's

302
00:22:30.039 --> 00:22:30.839
a lot of stuff up in the
end, there's a lot I'm moving parts.

303
00:22:32.200 --> 00:22:33.720
What should they be doing to prepare
to think about how do I,

304
00:22:34.359 --> 00:22:37.559
you know, get ready for what
may be coming down the pipe and the

305
00:22:37.640 --> 00:22:41.880
changes that are that are you know, possible coming both technologically business wise.

306
00:22:41.880 --> 00:22:44.960
What do we what do we do
to adapt? I start out with,

307
00:22:45.160 --> 00:22:47.960
you have a rule that's going to
be final. You're going to have to

308
00:22:48.000 --> 00:22:52.559
put significant resources on the ten seventy
one small houses did. But then I

309
00:22:52.640 --> 00:23:00.880
also be quickly to overdraft. It
is a major issue or the current administration

310
00:23:02.599 --> 00:23:07.640
or the current director. We believe
that it was in the Unified Agenda that

311
00:23:07.680 --> 00:23:15.279
they're adding overdraft. It is a
significant and auduct of almost every bank in

312
00:23:15.319 --> 00:23:18.119
the country, for sure, and
you have to look at the risk of

313
00:23:18.200 --> 00:23:26.440
that either being highly regulated or going
away in some form regulation. And how

314
00:23:26.480 --> 00:23:30.240
do you how do you manage that
risk, not just for that product,

315
00:23:30.279 --> 00:23:34.720
but you are you know your revenue
side, and every institution is different.

316
00:23:34.759 --> 00:23:40.640
And you can see that many CPA
members have pivoted on their overdraft programs in

317
00:23:40.680 --> 00:23:44.400
the last year or so, pivoted. How how do you see em pivoting?

318
00:23:44.440 --> 00:23:48.519
What's the So A lot of them
have changed their under overdraft practices.

319
00:23:48.079 --> 00:23:52.480
Some have lowered the overdraft fee,
some have put a diminimus so if you

320
00:23:52.559 --> 00:23:57.160
overdraft by fifty dollars or less,
they won't charge, and there's no fee

321
00:23:57.160 --> 00:24:00.680
to have Some of them have a
twenty four hour ruling off period that if

322
00:24:00.680 --> 00:24:06.559
you overdraft, but you cure it
within twenty four hours, there's no Some

323
00:24:06.640 --> 00:24:12.160
have eliminated it all together, many
of eliminating the non sufficient funds charge.

324
00:24:14.240 --> 00:24:21.039
But that is many CBA members,
but that's not the entire banking ecosystems.

325
00:24:21.039 --> 00:24:26.240
Many banks that happen to changes.
We will see what the Bureau decides terms

326
00:24:26.519 --> 00:24:32.920
a rule a rule and how restrictive
or what kind of approach they have.

327
00:24:32.960 --> 00:24:37.839
You seen motion among the members to
find a more traditional lending alternative. A

328
00:24:37.880 --> 00:24:41.559
lot of times it's overdraft these it's
like a small dollar loan in disguise slip

329
00:24:41.759 --> 00:24:47.000
and we're really excited about it.
When I was at the CFBB, we

330
00:24:47.319 --> 00:24:51.359
a lot of work urged backs with
it. Two of small dollar products.

331
00:24:51.640 --> 00:24:56.839
Yeah, it's really challenging. It's
very hard to operationalize that with losing your

332
00:24:56.839 --> 00:25:03.359
shirt and to at least make back
your Yeah. And so we've seen at

333
00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:10.200
least five major banks in the last
six to eight months introduce small dollar loans

334
00:25:11.000 --> 00:25:18.880
and so far, so good.
They see it as a product to help

335
00:25:18.920 --> 00:25:25.160
their customers so that they're not leaving
the banking system rather than looking at it

336
00:25:25.200 --> 00:25:29.160
as a revenue center as much.
Yep. It's it's okay to use this

337
00:25:29.319 --> 00:25:33.160
product to help your customers stay in
the bank rather than go outside. So

338
00:25:33.680 --> 00:25:40.000
we're continuing to have conversations with regulators
to encourage them to encourage our banks to

339
00:25:40.039 --> 00:25:42.240
do it. You think it's needed. There is a clear need for short

340
00:25:42.319 --> 00:25:45.599
term liquidity, yep. And if
you're going to regulate overdraft, it's like

341
00:25:45.640 --> 00:25:48.200
the balloon they're gonna have to go. So we need the money, they

342
00:25:48.319 --> 00:25:51.599
need the money, they're gonna have
to get it. So where they're gonna

343
00:25:51.599 --> 00:25:56.240
go payday loan is worse, eighty
days worse. We would prefer that they

344
00:25:56.279 --> 00:25:59.039
stay in the banking system. Yeah, yeah, but it is to your

345
00:25:59.079 --> 00:26:03.400
point. Are to operationalize a small
dollar loan at a cost that is recouvable

346
00:26:03.720 --> 00:26:07.079
on that duration in dollar amount.
I mean, it's just even at any

347
00:26:07.079 --> 00:26:10.319
reasonable industrate, there's not a lot
of money in that. And so the

348
00:26:10.400 --> 00:26:15.720
handard across his hard board of a
bank to support a program going into it

349
00:26:15.880 --> 00:26:18.599
knowing it's tend to lose money.
We're not in the business of losing money.

350
00:26:18.839 --> 00:26:22.240
No businesses are. Let's spend x
amount of money knowing that when we

351
00:26:22.279 --> 00:26:26.559
actually roll the product out, it's
coles after the vestment. Hitles just lose

352
00:26:26.559 --> 00:26:32.240
money for it's not a good look. So I'm very investment the banks that

353
00:26:32.279 --> 00:26:37.160
have done it, Yep, they
understand the need. They're evaluating what the

354
00:26:37.240 --> 00:26:44.240
true potential boss is versus maybe they'll
make a profit in the long run.

355
00:26:44.599 --> 00:26:47.200
They look at it a little differently. It's sort of like overdraft. They're

356
00:26:47.200 --> 00:26:52.559
looking at it from a different lens. Retain our customers and what's the value

357
00:26:52.559 --> 00:26:56.720
of that versus just your revenue on
this product, on overdraft and on small

358
00:26:56.759 --> 00:27:02.839
dollar to changing how banks are looking
at it, there's more competition, so

359
00:27:03.000 --> 00:27:07.759
you sort of look at how do
we maximize our ability to keep our bustomers

360
00:27:08.359 --> 00:27:14.759
and help them become the better buster. Yeah yeah. Let me ask you

361
00:27:15.039 --> 00:27:18.279
one last thing, which is what
do you think separates institutions end up with

362
00:27:18.519 --> 00:27:22.559
good relationships with their regulators from those
that strong I mean, I've seen it's

363
00:27:22.559 --> 00:27:25.480
really funny. Is it worked with
a lot of banks. I'm sure you

364
00:27:25.559 --> 00:27:30.079
seen this. I had two banks
who gave a totally polar opposite answers about

365
00:27:30.079 --> 00:27:32.680
how they wanted to work with their
regulators, and I thought that they had

366
00:27:32.680 --> 00:27:36.319
the same ic, not just the
same just the same regulator with the same

367
00:27:36.400 --> 00:27:38.200
guy walking on the doors. I
don't know if you knew this. When

368
00:27:38.200 --> 00:27:41.920
I worked at FEAR, I managed
the relationship we industry in bureau, I

369
00:27:42.000 --> 00:27:45.240
did not know that. So so
I dealt with all of the banks,

370
00:27:45.440 --> 00:27:51.480
all of the financial institutions and help
them navigate how do you interact with your

371
00:27:51.480 --> 00:27:56.839
regulator the bureau Later and the positive
part of Valley speaking a positive impact and

372
00:27:56.920 --> 00:28:02.000
the value of having include having a
yeah. And there were a couple of

373
00:28:02.720 --> 00:28:06.359
banks, for instance, that were
rock stars at it, and I wouldn't

374
00:28:06.359 --> 00:28:08.680
tell them, like, you guys
have the huge advantage of your better because

375
00:28:10.279 --> 00:28:15.160
strong relationships, you've become a trusted
entity. When you speak, the Bureau

376
00:28:15.200 --> 00:28:18.359
listens to you, right. And
then there's those that just sort of dodge

377
00:28:18.359 --> 00:28:21.440
it because they're afraid of They may
say something where if I go talk to

378
00:28:21.480 --> 00:28:26.079
this person, it may refers to
dig the enforcement side, which never happened

379
00:28:26.160 --> 00:28:30.559
when I was there six years.
I never saw like somebody talk to the

380
00:28:30.640 --> 00:28:36.359
markets teams, they get up call
the enforcement here that the Bureau when your

381
00:28:36.519 --> 00:28:41.400
career step like that's your job and
if you ruin that relationship. You're done,

382
00:28:41.599 --> 00:28:44.960
like nobody's gonna talk to you.
So and plus people don't come in

383
00:28:44.960 --> 00:28:51.160
and disclose things that are illegal.
That's not not These are conversations about markets,

384
00:28:51.599 --> 00:28:56.599
what they're seeing, What can we
as a bank do better. I

385
00:28:56.720 --> 00:29:02.839
saw a lot of banks who prove
of the years and their relationships. They

386
00:29:02.920 --> 00:29:10.279
should feel comforted talking to their regulators. It's important so that they understand how

387
00:29:10.319 --> 00:29:15.279
you operate because every institution is a
little bit different and they don't understand all

388
00:29:15.319 --> 00:29:18.240
those dynamics. So the more you
share with them, the different pressures you're

389
00:29:18.279 --> 00:29:25.400
feeling, the different dynamics within your
market, it's it's critical that they understand

390
00:29:25.480 --> 00:29:30.039
them. Interesting so early often communication
on broad topics. Yeah, it's it's

391
00:29:30.039 --> 00:29:33.279
just been fascinating to watch how those
you kind of as an outside somebody,

392
00:29:33.400 --> 00:29:37.240
came from a different issue. It
should just be like a consistent approach,

393
00:29:37.279 --> 00:29:40.160
and it feels like it's a very
different sid relationships. It's fascinating to see

394
00:29:40.160 --> 00:29:42.119
how some navigate that to their advantage
of others, to their detriment. When

395
00:29:42.240 --> 00:29:45.079
I was at the Bureau, I
was starting thirteen in this role. I

396
00:29:45.119 --> 00:29:49.680
started the office and I could not
get one of the top four banks to

397
00:29:49.759 --> 00:29:55.440
engage with us for nine months at
all at all. That's crazy. I

398
00:29:55.440 --> 00:30:00.880
don't know if it was just they
were just not well connected and couldn't figure

399
00:30:00.920 --> 00:30:06.359
it out. But the second we
actually were able to sit down, got

400
00:30:06.359 --> 00:30:10.759
them in front of the director,
had a great conversation. They instantly saw

401
00:30:10.839 --> 00:30:14.119
the value and quickly turned one the
best. They would come in on a

402
00:30:14.200 --> 00:30:18.200
quarterly basis. They bring in different
people in the institution, from the CEO

403
00:30:18.440 --> 00:30:23.079
to the head of consumer lending.
We had banks come in and get the

404
00:30:23.319 --> 00:30:26.720
fraud people would come come in and
scare the heck out of us, but

405
00:30:26.799 --> 00:30:30.839
it really showed how smart they are. Yeah. Yeah, there's some of

406
00:30:30.839 --> 00:30:34.240
the large banks and they bring in
the cybersecurity people and they scare the heck

407
00:30:34.240 --> 00:30:37.519
out of the bureau. But it
actually shows like this is what we're doing

408
00:30:37.519 --> 00:30:41.559
to protect our It reminds me of
this. There's a saying it silk in

409
00:30:41.640 --> 00:30:45.119
value when they whenever you come upon
a seeminglarly stupid decision or you ask how

410
00:30:45.119 --> 00:30:48.960
did this decision get made? It's
usually a thoughtful person making a thoughtful trade

411
00:30:48.960 --> 00:30:52.720
off that you haven't yet contemplated,
which is like usually these things that seem

412
00:30:53.119 --> 00:30:56.119
not to make sense to you.
Are there because of some other trade off,

413
00:30:56.160 --> 00:31:00.480
some other considerations you you couldn't even
think about yet this I'm smart,

414
00:31:00.519 --> 00:31:03.640
thoughtful, well meeting person made.
And the more you can make people aware

415
00:31:03.680 --> 00:31:06.680
of what those trade offs are,
what we're seeing, why maybe we've got

416
00:31:06.720 --> 00:31:08.440
these extra rules in place to open
a well, we're seeing a huge ticketup

417
00:31:08.440 --> 00:31:11.640
in fraud. Show you some examples
of what fraud looks like. Oh my

418
00:31:11.720 --> 00:31:14.920
god, that's terrifying. Yeah,
and that's why we're Be's why we're doing

419
00:31:14.920 --> 00:31:17.759
these things. I think the better
off you are to help people understand where

420
00:31:17.759 --> 00:31:19.799
you're coming from. Excellent, Dan, I really appreciate you for making the

421
00:31:19.799 --> 00:31:22.720
time to come by and talk to
us. This was fascinating. I learn

422
00:31:22.759 --> 00:31:25.480
a whole bunch of new numbers I'm
gonna have to try and memorize in my

423
00:31:25.519 --> 00:31:29.440
head. But thanks for taking the
time. Thanks for having me. Upstart

424
00:31:29.480 --> 00:31:33.200
partners with banks and credit unions to
help grow their consumer loan portfolios and deliver

425
00:31:33.279 --> 00:31:40.000
a modern all digital lending experiments.
As the average consumer becomes more digitally savvy,

426
00:31:40.279 --> 00:31:44.720
it only makes sense that their bank
does too. Upstarts AI lending platform

427
00:31:44.839 --> 00:31:51.119
uses sophisticated machine learning models to more
accurately identify risk and approve more applicants than

428
00:31:51.160 --> 00:31:56.200
traditional credit models. With fraud rates
near zero, upstarts all digital experience reduces

429
00:31:56.279 --> 00:32:02.119
manual processing for banks and offers a
sple and convenient experience for consumers. Whether

430
00:32:02.160 --> 00:32:07.880
you're looking to grow and enhance your
existing personal and auto lending programs or you're

431
00:32:07.880 --> 00:32:12.880
just getting started, upstart can help. Upstart offers an end to end solution

432
00:32:12.960 --> 00:32:15.880
that can help you find more credit
worthy borrowers within your risk profile. With

433
00:32:16.039 --> 00:32:22.559
all digital underwriting, onboarding, loan
closing, and servicing, It's all possible

434
00:32:22.559 --> 00:32:27.200
with Upstart in your corner. Learn
more about finding new borrowers, enhancing your

435
00:32:27.240 --> 00:32:31.440
credit decisioning process, and growing your
business by visiting upstart dot com Slash four

436
00:32:31.680 --> 00:32:37.440
dash banks. That's upstart dot com
slash foward dash banks. You've been listening

437
00:32:37.440 --> 00:32:42.319
to Leaders and Lending from Upstart,
make sure you never miss an episode.

438
00:32:42.400 --> 00:32:45.839
Subscribe to Leaders in Lending in your
favorite podcast player using Apple Podcasts. Leave

439
00:32:45.880 --> 00:32:50.240
us a quick rating by capping the
number of stars you think the show deserves.

440
00:32:50.240 --> 00:32:52.160
Thanks for listening. Until next time.